Machined 7075 aluminium aerospace component

Materials guide

6061 vs 7075 aluminium: which one for your part

Aluminium grades are not interchangeable: 7075 is nearly twice as strong as 6061, with sharp differences in cost, machinability and finishing. Here is how to pick the right alloy for a machined part — with the numbers behind each call.

Side by side (T6 temper)

Published values for the T6 temper (a common heat-treated condition) — use them for planning; we confirm against your drawing when we quote.
Property6061-T67075-T6
Tensile strength~310 MPa~572 MPa
Yield strength~276 MPa~503 MPa
Hardness~95 HB~150 HB
Density2.70 g/cm³2.81 g/cm³
MachinabilityExcellent (the benchmark)Very good (chips break cleanly)
WeldabilityGoodPoor, not for arc welding
Corrosion, bareGoodLower, usually coated
AnodizingClean, even colourOK; Type III common, colour can vary
Relative cost$$$ (~1.5–2× in bar)
Typical useBrackets, housings, frames, generalAerospace, high-stress, moulds

6061, the workhorse

6061 offers excellent machinability, corrosion resistance, weldability and an even anodized finish. It is strong enough for most brackets, housings and general parts, while remaining the more economical and faster choice to machine.

7075, the strong one

7075 provides nearly twice the tensile strength of 6061, making it the default for structural, load-bearing and aerospace parts. The trade-offs: it costs more, does not weld well, and corrodes more easily when left bare — so it is normally anodized (often Type III, a thick hard-anodize coating) or plated for protection.

From our floor: 7075's strength is real, but specifying it as a precaution is rarely worth the cost — it is more expensive, cannot be arc-welded, and anodizes less evenly. For a cosmetic, coloured part, 6061 generally takes a cleaner, more uniform anodize. Reserve 7075 for parts where the load or weight target genuinely demands it.

Three quick mistakes

  • Choosing 7075 when 6061 is sufficient — it raises material and machining cost while sacrificing weldability and an even anodize colour.
  • Trying to weld 7075 — it is highly prone to hot cracking in arc welding, so design joints to be bolted or mechanically fastened instead.
  • Leaving 7075 bare — always specify an anodized or plated finish to guard against corrosion and stress-corrosion cracking (SCC), the cracking that can occur when a stressed part sits in a corrosive environment.

Quick rule

Strength- or weight-critical? Choose 7075. Driven by cost, corrosion resistance, weldability or general use? Choose 6061. If you are unsure, send the part and we will advise during DFM (design-for-manufacturing) review.

Get a quote in 48 hours See the materials guide

同为铝合金,二者却不可互换:强度相差近一倍,成本、加工性及表面处理效果也截然不同。本文以数据详解如何为零件选材。

一表看懂(T6 状态)

T6 状态常见标称值,仅供选型参考,报价时按图核对为准。
对比项6061-T67075-T6
抗拉强度约 310 MPa约 572 MPa
屈服强度约 276 MPa约 503 MPa
硬度约 95 HB约 150 HB
密度2.70 g/cm³2.81 g/cm³
可加工性极好(业内基准)很好(断屑利落)
可焊性差,不宜电弧焊
裸材耐蚀较低,通常需做表面处理
阳极氧化上色均匀干净可做,常用硬质 III 型,颜色偏差略大
相对成本$$$(棒料约 1.5–2 倍)
常见用途支架、外壳、框架、通用件航空、高载荷、模具

6061:通用主力

易加工、耐蚀性好、可焊接、阳极氧化着色均匀。适用于多数支架、外壳及通用零件,是性价比高且效率稳定的选择。

7075:高强之选

强度接近 6061 的两倍,是结构件、承载件及航空航天零件的首选。代价在于:成本更高、基本不可焊、裸材耐蚀性较低,因此通常需进行阳极氧化(常用硬质 III 型)或电镀处理。

工厂经验:7075 的强度确实可观,但仅为「保险」而默认选用并不划算:成本更高、基本不可焊、阳极上色也不如 6061 均匀。彩色外观件选 6061,上色更均匀干净。真正承受大载荷或需要减重的部位,才建议选用 7075。

三大常见误区

  • 6061 已满足需求却选用 7075—— 增加成本,且牺牲可焊性与外观一致性。
  • 尝试焊接 7075—— 该材料不适合常规电弧焊,接头应改为螺栓连接或胶接。
  • 7075 裸材直接使用—— 务必进行阳极氧化或电镀,以提升耐蚀性及抗应力腐蚀能力。

一句话怎么选

对强度或重量要求高?选 7075。关注成本、耐蚀性、可焊性或通用场景?选 6061。若不确定,欢迎提供零件图纸,我们将在 DFM 评审阶段给出专业建议。

来图定制,48 小时内报价 查看材料指南
CNC turning on the Fenva Precision production floor

Not sure which alloy?

We'll advise at DFM review.

Send the part and we'll recommend 6061 or 7075 for the job, and quote in 48 hours.